P. v. Cardona
Defendant appeals from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of oral copulation on an unconscious person, burglary, and prowling. On appeal, defendant claims there is insufficient evidence to support his convictions for oral copulation and burglary. Defendant claims the court erred in failing to instruct the jury that a reasonable but mistaken belief that the victim was awake is a defense. As well as claims that the prosecutor and trial judge were guilty of misconduct. Court affirms the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Cardona