P. v. Franklin
Sixteen year-old Kaieesha Franklin (defendant) argues that the trial court abused its discretion in imposing the upper term following her conviction for attempted murder (Pen. Code, §§ 664/187, subd. (a)).[1] We will affirm.
P. v. Franklin
Sixteen year-old Kaieesha Franklin (defendant) argues that the trial court abused its discretion in imposing the upper term following her conviction for attempted murder (Pen. Code, §§ 664/187, subd. (a)).[1] We will affirm.
Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.
Comments on P. v. Franklin