legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re J.T.
J.T., who was born in September 1999, was taken into protective custody when his father, A.T. (Father), was arrested on charges he sexually abused J.T.’s half sister, D.U. J.T.’s mother, M.U. (Mother), successfully completed a case plan, and, following a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 364[1] (further code references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code), the juvenile court terminated dependency proceedings. Pursuant to section 362.4, the court issued final custody orders, giving Mother full legal and physical custody of J.T. and denying Father visitation rights.
Father challenges the final custody order denying him any right of visitation with J.T.[2] We conclude the juvenile court did not err by denying Father visitation rights, and therefore affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale