legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Tso
Appellant Orlando Gene Tso challenges a probation condition precluding his use and possession of peyote and medical marijuana. As we conclude appellant seeks to appeal from a nonappealable order, the appeal is dismissed.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On March 8, 2010, the Sonoma County District Attorney filed a complaint against appellant alleging a felony count of unlawfully carrying a concealed dirk or dagger (Pen. Code, former § 12020, subd. (a)(4); now § 21310);[1] and misdemeanor counts of resisting arrest (§ 148, subd. (a)(1)) and public intoxication (§ 647, subd. (f)). On June 17, appellant entered a plea of no contest to the felony count, and the remaining counts were dismissed.
On July 15, 2010, the court suspended imposition of sentence and placed appellant on three years’ supervised probation, subject to various terms and conditions, including completion of a residential drug rehabilitation program, community service, chemical testing, and a condition precluding use and possession of alcoholic beverages and controlled substances without a valid prescription.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale