P. v. King
Defendant and appellant Renata Marquez King appeals from a judgment following her no contest plea to possession for sale of a controlled substance (cocaine base) and cruelty to a child by endangering health.[1] On appeal, defendant’s appointed counsel filed an opening brief in accordance with People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 requesting this court to conduct an independent review of the record to determine if there are any arguable issues. On April 10, 2013, we gave notice to defendant that counsel had failed to find any arguable issues and that defendant had 30 days within which to submit by brief or letter any grounds of appeal, contentions, or arguments she wished this court to consider. Defendant did not file a responsive brief or letter. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. King