P. v. Scott
Appellant Laquain Larry Scott appeals from a jury determination that he is a sexually violent predator (SVP) under the Sexually Violent Predator Act (SVPA or Act).[1] He contends that the Act violates the equal protection clause and that the use of a standard jury instruction defining SVPs was improper and violated his rights to due process. We disagree and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Scott