legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Jasmine
The father, Pedro C., and the child, Jasmine C., appeal from the juvenile court’s February 13, 2013 jurisdiction and disposition orders. They challenge the juvenile court’s jurisdictional findings under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (d) and (j).[1] The juvenile court found the child was at substantial risk of harm based on the father’s prolong sexual abuse of Michelle V. Michelle is the child’s half-sister. In addition, the father and the child object to the disposition order removing Jasmine from the father’s custody. We affirm the jurisdiction and disposition orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale