Ripken v. Ballard
After the trial court found defendant Lois Ballard had disobeyed a 2002 judgment restraining her and her agents from trespassing, blocking, or putting debris on the neighboring property of plaintiffs Madelyn M. Ripken, Ryan D. Ripken and Susan J. Ripken (the Ripkens), it ordered Ballard to pay the Ripkens’ attorney fees and costs (Code Civ. Proc.,[1] § 1218, subd. (a)).
In this pro se appeal, Ballard contends the court erred in awarding attorney fees because the Ripkens failed to “provide[] competent evidence” to support their claim. We disagree and affirm.

Comments on Ripken v. Ballard

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced