In re A.G.
Father appeals the denial of a petition to modify an order terminating his parental rights filed after this court issued a limited reversal and remanded so the juvenile court could require compliance with the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). (See In re A.G. (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 1390 (A.G.)). Father contends the juvenile court was incorrect when it ruled that our disposition in A.G. precluded it from exercising jurisdiction over his modification petition. We agree with the juvenile court that our remand was for the limited purpose of complying with ICWA and affirm.
Comments on In re A.G.