legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v.Thompson
Joseph Emmannuell Thompson pleaded guilty to receiving stolen property (Pen. Code,[1] § 496d), and now appeals the denial of his motion to withdraw his plea. Thompson contends the court abused its discretion in denying the motion because (1) his plea was coerced and offered as a package deal with that of his codefendant brother, Michael Thompson;[2] and (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel, who failed to advise him fully of the consequences of his plea and improperly negotiated it in the presence of Michael and Michael's counsel. We affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale