Fang v. Abuershard
Plaintiffs and appellants Linda Fang and Maria Luisa Raymundo appeal from a judgment in their favor, following a court retrial on the issue of damages to trees on their properties. They contend the trial court erred in its award of damages because: (a) hearsay testimony of defendant and respondent Nazih Abuershard concerning the replacement cost of the trees was improperly admitted; (b) there was insufficient evidence supporting the court’s calculation of damages; and (c) the court incorrectly based its award solely on the fair market value of the trees.
Appellants request reversal of the damages award and take the position that damages should be awarded in an amount consistent with the testimony of their expert. We find no prejudicial error and affirm.
Comments on Fang v. Abuershard