Alma A. v. Katrina A.
The trial court granted the petition of plaintiff and respondent Alma M. (grandmother) for grandparent visitation of now nine-year-old David A. (child) under Family Code section 3102.[1] Defendant and appellant Katrina T., child’s mother (mother), appeals, claiming section 3102 is unconstitutional both facially and as applied, the court erred in failing to apply the presumption of parental fitness to decide the best interest of her child, and grandmother did not show by clear and convincing evidence denial of visitation would be detrimental to the child. Finding no error, we affirm.
Comments on Alma A. v. Katrina A.