legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Andrea B.
This is the second appeal involving this family, and our brief summary of the factual and procedural background is largely taken from our opinion in the prior appeal. (In re Andrea B. (Aug. 23, 2012, B234551) [nonpub. opn.].)
On August 30, 2007, the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) removed Andrea, who was born with congenital abnormalities from her parents’ custody. She was placed with her grandmother on October 17, 2007. (In re Andrea B., supra, B234551, at p. 2) Several months later, DCFS removed Andrea from her grandmother’s custody and placed her in a foster home. (In re Andrea B., supra, B234551, at p. 4.) The guardianship eventually was terminated, and on August 23, 2012, we affirmed the juvenile court’s order. (In re Andrea B., supra, B234551, at p. 2.)
Meanwhile, Andrea’s younger sister Ariel was also removed from her parents’ custody. (In re Andrea B., supra, B234551, at p. 7.) She was eventually placed into a preadoptive foster home with Andrea.
On June 5, 2012, DCFS reported for a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 that a prospective home-studied adoptive parent had been identified for both girls. Both children were thriving in her care and the caregiver was committed to adopting them. DCFS recommended that the juvenile court terminate parental rights and free the children for adoption.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale