legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.J.
Appellant L.J. (father) appeals from the juvenile court’s order issued at a contested Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing[1] terminating his parental rights as to his seven-year-old daughter, A.J., and two-year-old son, S.J. He contends the juvenile court violated Penal Code section 2625 by conducting the hearing in his absence and without a waiver. He also contends trial counsel was ineffective. We affirm the juvenile court’s order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale