P. v. Rosemond
A jury convicted appellant Malcolm Rosemond of shooting at a motor vehicle and six counts of assault with a firearm. He contends (1) his convictions must be reversed because his due process rights were violated when the trial court found he was competent to stand trial; (2) his sentence should be vacated because the trial court was unaware of its sentencing discretion when it imposed the upper term; and (3) an incorrect amount of fees was imposed at sentencing.
We agree with his contention concerning the amount of fees, which we will order corrected, but disagree with his other arguments and affirm his convictions and judgment.
Comments on P. v. Rosemond