legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re J.B.
Plaintiff and respondent San Bernardino Department of Children and Family Services (the Department) took J.B. (minor; born August 2012) into protective custody when he was released from the hospital after both minor, and defendant and appellant K.M. (mother), tested positively for amphetamines. Mother, and defendant and appellant E.B. (father) (collectively “parents”), had failed to reunify with three previous children. The department placed minor with the prospective adoptive parents (PAPs) on August 10, 2012. The juvenile court denied parents reunification services due to their failure to reunify with the three other children. On March 5, 2013, the juvenile court terminated parents’ parental rights.
On appeal, mother contends insufficient evidence supported the court’s determination the beneficial parental relationship exception did not apply. Father does not independently challenge the juvenile court’s order, but maintains that should mother prevail, his parental rights must also be reinstated. (In re DeJohn B. (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 100, 102, 110.) We hold substantial evidence supports the juvenile court’s order terminating parental rights. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale