In re M.C.
Antoine C. appeals following the summary denial of his modification petition (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 388)[1] in the juvenile dependency case of his daughter, M.C. Antoine contends that the court erred in denying him an evidentiary hearing on his petition, in which he requested reunification services. Antoine also contends that the delay in establishing his paternity deprived him of the opportunity to participate meaningfully in the case. We affirm.
Comments on In re M.C.