C.A. v. Super. Ct.
The mother of C.C. challenges the decision of the juvenile court to terminate reunification services and set a selection and implementation hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.[1] She contends that there was not sufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s finding that returning her daughter to her custody would create a substantial risk of harm to the child. We disagree and so we deny the petition.
Comments on C.A. v. Super. Ct.