P. v. Nickerson
Jaelyne Nickerson (Defendant) appeals from an order revoking her probation and ordering her to serve the 10 year sentence previously imposed, but suspended, by the court. She argues the court violated her right to due process by ordering her probation revoked without engaging in an impartial evaluation of whether her violation of the terms of her probation was significant enough to “merit[] imposition of the ten-year prison term . . . .†(Capitalization omitted.) She also argues the court erred by ordering her to pay the full amount of restitution sought by one of her victims, Cal State Fullerton, because a portion of that sum was not supported by substantial evidence.
Comments on P. v. Nickerson