In re Jerome G.
Appellant Jerome G. appeals from an order sustaining a petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602[1] and placing him home on probation. He contends the victim’s identification of him was the result of an unconstitutionally suggestive procedure, and should not have been admitted at trial. In the absence of other evidence connecting him to the crime, he claims the error was prejudicial and the order should be reversed. We find no error and affirm the court’s order.
Comments on In re Jerome G.