In re S.H.
J.H. (mother) appealed from a February 2013 juvenile court order terminating parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26) to her 16-month-old daughter, S.[1] This court previously upheld the juvenile court’s decision to remove S. from parental custody, deny mother reunification services, and set the termination hearing. (J.H. v. Superior Court (Jan. 15, 2013, F065695 [nonpub. opn.].)
After reviewing the entire record, mother’s court-appointed appellate counsel informed this court he could find no arguable issues to raise on mother’s behalf. Counsel requested and this court granted leave for mother to personally file a letter setting forth a good cause showing that an arguable issue of reversible error did exist. (In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835, 844.)
Mother has now submitted a letter asking that S. either be placed with her or with mother’s family. Mother’s letter neither addresses the termination proceedings nor sets forth a good cause showing that any arguable issue of reversible error at the termination hearing does exist. (In re Phoenix H., supra, 47 Cal.4th at p. 844.)
Comments on In re S.H.