legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re D.Y.
The juvenile court asserted dependency jurisdiction over D.Y. and K.Y., the two children of Glenda C. (mother) and W.Y. (father). On the day set for a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing, counsel for mother and father requested a contested hearing.[1] Neither parent was present in court. The juvenile court requested an offer of proof. Following mother’s counsel’s offer of proof, the court denied the requests for a contested hearing and terminated parental rights. On appeal, the parents contend the juvenile court violated their due process rights by denying them a contested hearing. They also argue the juvenile court erred in refusing to apply the parent-child beneficial relationship exception to adoption. We find no error and affirm the trial court order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale