legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.C.
Ana C. (mother) appeals from an order terminating reunification services and setting a selection and implementation hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26)[1] for her sons, five-year-old A.C. and two-year-old L.H. She also appeals from an order denying her petition for modification pursuant to section 388. She contends: (1) the juvenile court abused its discretion when it denied her motion to continue the section 388 and section 366.26 hearing, and (2) there was insufficient evidence to support the finding that A.C. and L.H. were adoptable. We find no error and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale