Bonnigson v. Bonnigson
After a half-day court trial, the trial court ruled that an oral settlement negotiated by the parties was a binding contract. Defendant and appellant Lawrence M. Bonnigson (Lawrence) appeals, contending that there was no binding contract because the parties had only agreed on a settlement amount but had not agreed on the other terms of the settlement agreement, including a hold harmless clause and dismissal of a cross-petition.
Comments on Bonnigson v. Bonnigson