Bielasz v. Mestler Construction
Mestler Construction, Inc. (Mestler) appeals following a jury verdict against it in a lawsuit brought by Roger Bielasz and Dena Bielasz (the Bielaszes) finding that Mestler breached contracts to design a residence and to perform building pad preparation work. Mestler contends that the trial court prejudicially erred by denying its motion in limine to exclude evidence of the damages that the Bielaszes suffered as a result of the contractual breaches. As we will explain, we conclude that the trial court was within its discretion to deny the motion in limine and to admit the Bielaszes' evidence of damages. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on Bielasz v. Mestler Construction