legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re N.L.
C.L. (Mother), appeals from the dispositional order in this dependency case. The juvenile court declared the children (N.L. and X.L.) dependents of the court (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300)[1] and ordered them placed in a foster home.
Mother contends the juvenile court erred by failing to offer her reasonable reunification services, including visitation, and by placing the children in a foster home outside the county without following proper procedures. Mother also contends one of the allegations of the section 300 petition concerning X.L. was not supported by substantial evidence. For the reasons explained below, we will affirm the juvenile court’s dispositional order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale