In re R.C.
The juvenile court found true the allegation that R.C., age 12, committed two separate lewd acts upon a child (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (a))[1] in March of 2011. R.C. was declared a ward of the court and ordered to reside in the custody of his father and under the supervision of the probation officer.
On appeal, R.C. challenges the admission of his confession into evidence and the sufficiency of the evidence to support the juvenile court’s true findings of section 288, subdivision (a). He also contends that the juvenile court violated his constitutional right to due process when it found he violated section 288 without substantial evidence of intent. We disagree and affirm.
Comments on In re R.C.