legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Phinsavanh
Phonessavanh Phinsavanh appeals a judgment following his jury conviction of one count of carjacking (Pen. Code, § 215, subd. (a))[1] and one count of unlawful taking or driving a vehicle (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a)). On appeal, he contends his carjacking conviction must be reversed because: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support findings that the victim possessed the vehicle at the time of the taking and Phinsavanh used force or fear to take the vehicle; and (2) the carjacking statute was not intended to address the circumstances in this case.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
At about 12:00 p.m. on November 10, 2011, Marcus Neal parked his black Ford Expedition on the street in front of his grandmother's house on Hilltop Drive. He left its doors unlocked, its keys in the ignition, and its windows down. He went inside to assist his uncle in lifting his grandmother into bed in the front bedroom.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale