P. v. Dickerson
On appeal, defendant Tyrell D. Dickerson asks this court to review the material disclosed at the in camera hearing following his Pitchess[1] motion. Next, defendant contends the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction for burglary. Additionally, defendant maintains his due process rights were violated when the trial court instructed the jury with CALJIC No. 2.15. Lastly, defendant asserts that the October 1, 2011, amendments to Penal Code[2] section 4019 must be applied to his case. We disagree with defendant and affirm the judgment in its entirety.
Comments on P. v. Dickerson