legal news


Register | Forgot Password

B.J. v. Superior Court
B.J. and K.U. (parents) petition this court for an extraordinary writ pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 and California Rules of Court, rule 8.452, seeking review of the juvenile court’s order terminating their reunification services and setting the matter for hearing to implement a permanent plan for their son, B.T. (minor).[1] Parents seek this relief on the ground that the evidence in the record fails to support the juvenile court’s findings that they failed to make substantial progress on their case plan and that returning minor to their care would present a substantial risk of harm to his physical or emotional well-being. We deny the writ petition, and deny as moot parents’ related request for a stay of these proceedings.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale