legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Delsie
A jury found defendant Rudolph Delsie guilty of first degree murder, during the commission of which he personally used a deadly weapon. The trial court then sustained recidivist allegations. It sentenced him to state prison.
To reorder defendant’s arguments on appeal, he contends the trial court erred in denying a motion for mistrial based on stricken testimony about an excluded subject area; there is insufficient evidence of his identity as the killer of the victim; there is insufficient evidence to support an instruction on aiding and abetting;[1] and the prosecutor committed misconduct in asserting the truth of hearsay evidence. We reject defendant’s various claims of error and shall affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale