In re F.G.
F.G. (father) and C.G. (mother) appeal from a juvenile court judgment terminating their parental rights and selecting adoption as the permanent plan (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26)[1] concerning their son, F.G. (born 2001), and daughter, S.G. (born 2003). Father challenges the evidence supporting the juvenile court’s rejection of his evidence and argument that the case came with the exception to termination described by section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i) (no termination if termination would be detrimental to the child because the parents maintained regular visitation and the child could benefit from continuing the relationship). Mother agrees with father’s argument and asserts that we must reverse the judgment as to her if we reverse the judgment as to father. We affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re F.G.