legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re F.G.
F.G. (father) and C.G. (mother) appeal from a juvenile court judgment terminating their parental rights and selecting adoption as the permanent plan (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26)[1] concerning their son, F.G. (born 2001), and daughter, S.G. (born 2003). Father challenges the evidence supporting the juvenile court’s rejection of his evidence and argument that the case came with the exception to termination described by section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i) (no termination if termination would be detrimental to the child because the parents maintained regular visitation and the child could benefit from continuing the relationship). Mother agrees with father’s argument and asserts that we must reverse the judgment as to her if we reverse the judgment as to father. We affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale