In re S.D.
The court found that appellant, S.D., was a person described in Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 after appellant admitted allegations charging him with possession of a dirk or dagger (Pen. Code, § 12020, subd. (a)(4)).
On appeal, appellant contends that one of his conditions of probation is constitutionally overbroad. We will find merit to this contention and modify the condition at issue. In all other respects, we affirm.
Comments on In re S.D.