In re Trinity S.
Dana S., the paternal grandmother and former legal guardian of Trinity S., appeals from the juvenile court’s orders made at the 18-month review hearing terminating Dana’s reunification services and the guardianship, and setting a review hearing under section 366.3. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 366.22, 728.)[1] Dana challenges the juvenile court’s findings of detriment if Trinity were returned to her care and that she was provided reasonable services, arguing there is insufficient evidence of both and the juvenile court failed to state a factual basis for its detriment finding. Dana further contends the juvenile court erred when, after terminating her reunification services and guardianship, it set a section 366.3 hearing instead of a section 366.26 hearing, and her trial attorney rendered ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
Comments on In re Trinity S.