In re L.P.
The juvenile court terminated E.W.’s (Father) parental rights to his daughter, L.P. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26)[1] and denied Father’s request to change a court order (§ 388). Father contends the juvenile court erred by terminating his parental rights because the court should have applied the beneficial parent-child relationship exception to termination. (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).) Father contends the juvenile court erred in denying his request to change a court order because Father proved his circumstances had changed and he had a strong bond with L.P. We affirm.
Comments on In re L.P.