legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Sazo
Appellant Miguel Sazo appeals from the judgment entered following his convictions by jury on count 1 – kidnapping to commit forcible oral copulation, sodomy, or rape (Pen. Code, § 209, subd. (b)(1)),[1] four counts of forcible oral copulation (§ 288a, subd. (c)(2); counts 2, 6, 8, & 13) with findings as to each of counts 2 and 6 that appellant committed aggravated kidnapping (§ 667.61, subd. (d)(2)) and as to each of counts 2, 6, 8, and 13 that appellant committed an offense against multiple victims (§ 667.61, subd. (e)(5)), count 4 – forcible rape (§ 261, subd. (a)(2)) with findings appellant committed aggravated kidnapping (§ 667.61, subd. (d)(2)) and an offense against multiple victims (§ 667.61, subd. (e)(5)), count 5 – attempted forcible sodomy (§§ 664, 286, subd. (c)(2)), count 7 – criminal threats (§ 422), two counts of forcible sodomy (§ 286, subd. (c)(2); counts 10 & 14) with findings as to each count that appellant committed an offense against multiple victims (§ 667.61, subd. (e)(5)), count 11 – second degree robbery (§ 211), and two counts of impersonating a public officer (§ 146a, subd. (b); counts 12 & 15). The court sentenced appellant to prison for 141 years to life. We affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale