Melody M. v. Superior Court
Melody M. seeks extraordinary writ review (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.452) of the juvenile court’s orders issued at an 18-month review hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.22)[1] terminating her reunification services and setting a section 366.26 hearing to select a permanent plan for her three-year-old son, Christopher. Melody contends the juvenile court erred in finding it would be detrimental to return Christopher to her custody. Alternatively, she contends the Stanislaus County Community Services Agency (agency) did not provide her reasonable visitation. We deny the petition.
Comments on Melody M. v. Superior Court