In re M.L.
E. S. appeals an order terminating her parental rights to M. L. She contends that her due process rights were violated by lack of notice that at the selection and implementation hearing, pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, the San Bernardino County Children and Family Services department (CFS) would recommend adoption as the child’s permanent plan.[1] She also contends that the order must be reversed for failure to comply with the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.)
Comments on In re M.L.