P. v. Ulloa
Appellant Javier Manuel Ulloa contends substantial evidence does not support the jury’s true finding that the offenses of which he was convicted -- shooting at an occupied vehicle and assault with a firearm -- were committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with a criminal street gang, with the specific intent to promote, further and assist in criminal conduct by gang members within the meaning of Penal Code section 186.22, subdivision (b)(1)(C). Specifically, he contends the prosecution failed to present adequate evidence of the subject gang’s primary activities.[1] We conclude otherwise and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Ulloa