legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re R.C.

Robert C. (Father) appeals from an order of the juvenile court terminating his reunification services as to his daughter R.C. (Minor) at the 12-month review hearing. He contends the juvenile court erred: (1) in finding respondent San Mateo County Human Services Agency (Agency) provided him reasonable services to aid him in overcoming the problems that led to Minor’s removal (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21, subd. (e));[1] and (2) in reducing the frequency of visitation. We reject those contentions and affirm the juvenile court’s orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale