In re R.C.
Robert C. (Father) appeals from an order of the juvenile court terminating his reunification services as to his daughter R.C. (Minor) at the 12-month review hearing. He contends the juvenile court erred: (1) in finding respondent San Mateo County Human Services Agency (Agency) provided him reasonable services to aid him in overcoming the problems that led to Minor’s removal (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21, subd. (e));[1] and (2) in reducing the frequency of visitation. We reject those contentions and affirm the juvenile court’s orders.
Comments on In re R.C.