P. v. Trejo
Defendant and appellant Manuel Trejo appeals from an order denying his petition for an order granting additional presentence conduct credit pursuant to Penal Code sections 2933 and 4019 and an order correcting his abstract of judgment to reflect that his robbery conviction was a serious felony and not a violent felony. On appeal, defendant’s appointed counsel filed an opening brief in accordance with People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 requesting this court to conduct an independent review of the record to determine if there are any arguable issues. On January 23, 2013, we gave notice to defendant that counsel had failed to find any arguable issues and that defendant had 30 days within which to submit by brief or letter any grounds of appeal, contentions, or arguments he wished this court to consider. Defendant did not file a responsive brief or letter. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Trejo