legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Aultman
A jury found defendant and appellant Jacques Aultman, Jr., guilty of (1) rape accomplished by means of force, violence, duress, menace, or fear (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (a)(2));[1] (2) rape where the victim is prevented from resisting due to an intoxicating substance (§ 261, subd. (a)(3)); (3) oral copulation with a person under the age of 18 years old (§ 288a, subd. (b)(1)); (4) oral copulation where the victim is prevented from resisting due to an intoxicating substance (§ 288a, subd. (i)); and (5) sexual intercourse with a minor “who is not more than three years older or three years younger” than defendant (§ 261.5, subd. (b)). The trial court sentenced defendant to prison for a term of 10 years.
Defendant raises two issues on appeal. First, defendant contends substantial evidence does not support the conviction for forcible rape. Second, defendant asserts the trial court abused its discretion when imposing the upper prison term for the forcible rape conviction. We affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale