P. v. Anderson
In Napa County Superior Court, Carin Louise Paguio Anderson pleaded no contest to charges of second degree burglary and contributing to the delinquency of her minor daughter. When she was arrested for those offenses, the Solano County juvenile court removed Anderson’s daughter from her custody, and Anderson was ordered to participate in reunification services in the Solano County juvenile dependency case. In the Napa County criminal case, Anderson was granted probation. Over defense counsel’s objection, the trial court included a condition of Anderson’s probation requiring her to follow all orders entered in the Solano County juvenile dependency case. The trial court also imposed certain fees on Anderson, although it waived the imposition of other fees.
On appeal, Anderson does not contest the validity of her no contest plea. Instead, she argues the condition of her probation requiring her to follow all orders in the Solano County juvenile dependency proceeding is legally unauthorized and overbroad. She also contends the issue of fees must be remanded for reconsideration. The Attorney General concedes the fee issue must be remanded.
Comments on P. v. Anderson