P. v. Cardinalli
Defendant Vincent Bruce Cardinalli appeals a judgment of conviction entered following his plea of no contest to 100 counts of theft and fraud-related offenses. Defendant and members of his family, including his son and daughter, operated a tow truck business and a small claims law suit mill through which they used fabricated car towing and storage fee bills to defraud people.
On appeal, defendant asserts he is entitled to additional conduct credits under the amended provisions of Penal Code section 4019.[1] In addition, defendant argues the trial court erred in failing to order his daughter, who is one of his codefendants, jointly and severally liable for the restitution award to the victims in this case.
Comments on P. v. Cardinalli