In re C.G.
A.N. (mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s orders denying her petition to modify the court’s previous orders (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 388) and terminating her parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26).[1] Mother contends: (1) the juvenile court abused its discretion by denying mother’s request to reinstate her reunification services for six months, and (2) the court further erred by failing to apply the “beneficial relationship†exception to termination of parental rights (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)).
We disagree and affirm the court’s order.
Comments on In re C.G.