P. v. Palmer
Defendant and appellant Frank William Palmer (defendant) appeals from the denial of his postjudgment motion to increase his award of presentence custody credit. His appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), raising no issues and requesting a court review of the record. On December 18, 2012, we notified defendant of his counsel’s brief and gave him leave to file, within 30 days, his own brief or letter stating any grounds or argument he might wish to have considered. That time has elapsed, and defendant has submitted no brief or letter. We have reviewed the entire record and as we have found no error or arguable issues, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Palmer