P. v. Cole
Appellant Stein Heath Cole maintains the following: (1) the trial court erred when it allowed prior bad acts evidence as the evidence was irrelevant and prohibited by Evidence Code sections 352 and 1101, subdivision (b); (2) he was deprived of his state and federal due process rights, as well as his right to a reliable verdict, because the great bodily injury enhancement pursuant to Penal Code[1] section 12022.7 was imposed in the absence of substantial evidence; (3) the evidence was insufficient to prove attempted dissuasion of a witness; and (4) the trial court erred when it imposed consecutive terms on counts 9 through 12 as those terms are prohibited by section 654. We affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Cole