In re A.L.
Appellant J.L. (father) appeals from the October 1, 2012 order denying his request that his dependent daughter, A.L., be removed from foster care and placed with father’s childhood friend, T.D. Father contends the juvenile court erred in finding that T.D. was not a “nonrelative extended family member” (NREFM) within the meaning of the Welfare and Institutions Code.[1] We affirm.

Comments on In re A.L.

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced