legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Brown
On December 16, 2011, an information charged defendant and appellant Christopher Lee Brown with robbery under Penal Code[1] section 211. The information also alleged that defendant had served three prior prison terms under section 667.5, subdivision (b). Moreover, the information alleged that defendant previously had been convicted of a serious or violent felony, which constituted a strike prior under section 667, subdivisions (c) and (e)(1), and section 1170.12, subdivision (c)(1). The information further alleged that defendant had a prior conviction for a serious felony under section 667, subdivision (a). The information was subsequently amended to allege that defendant had a second strike prior.
On March 12, 2012, jury trial commenced. Three days later, the jury found defendant guilty of robbery in violation of section 211.[2]

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale