P. v. Sorenson
Ronald Sorenson appeals from a judgment declaring him to be a mentally disordered offender (MDO) and committing him to the Department of Mental Health for treatment. (Pen. Code, § 2962.)[1] Appellant contends that no admissible evidence was offered to support the trial court's findings that appellant's commitment offense involved the use of force or violence, and that he received the requisite 90 days of treatment within the year prior to his hearing before the Board of Parole Hearings (BPH). We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Sorenson